Is Stanford the most beautiful school in California? Probably. Planned by the great Frederick Law Olmstead, the Italianate architecture with it's open colonnades, carved arches, balustrades and tiled roofs, makes you think more of Renaissance Italy, than post gold rush California.
And, unlike Southern California which is infected with urban sprawl, pretty much wherever you look you find a verdant view. It's a little hard to imagine the enormous advances in science and technology that have come out of such a peaceful pastoral place.
I'm still not sure what's up with the the need to put a giant bell tower on what seems, every college and university campus in Northern California. Mills has its elegantly simple campanile designed by the brilliant Julia Morgan in 1904.
Berkeley has its beautiful Beaux-Art Sather Tower constructed in 1914.
So of course Stanford has its "mine is bigger and better than yours" fabulously phallic Hoover Tower built in 1941.
(Yes, I could make some inappropriate architectural double entendre remarks here but I'm just going to let it go)
From the architectural to the political, has anyone besides me wondered what happens to all that brain power that emanates from Stanford? Why are the highest offices in our federal government disproportionately stocked with Harvard and Yale grads? Is there something specific about Stanford that sends graduates off to do, or to create, rather than to govern? I'm just curious.
